The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has criticized the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for its refusal to accept responsibility for the Nigerian government’s decision to eliminate fuel subsidies. In a statement issued on Sunday, NLC National President Joe Ajaero characterized the IMF’s denial as “cynical,” alleging that the organization has a history of enforcing stringent economic measures on developing countries.
During a press conference at the IMF and World Bank Annual Meetings held in Washington, D.C., Abebe Selassie, the IMF’s Director for the African Region, asserted that the removal of the fuel subsidy by the Nigerian government is a matter of domestic concern.
Ajaero remarked that the IMF’s recent comments reflect an attempt to evade accountability, as it claims that Nigeria’s subsidy removal was a “domestic decision,” while disregarding its considerable impact on policy formulation in developing nations.
He stated, “Despite this denial, the IMF frequently promotes subsidy reductions as essential for fiscal sustainability, rendering its disavowal insincere in a nation that has often adhered to such recommendations.”
The statement further elaborated, “The IMF appears to be distancing itself from potential backlash resulting from these policies, but Nigerians are not deceived; we are aware of the detrimental effects of its harmful strategies on Nigeria and Africa.” He added, “It is disingenuous for the IMF to deny its complicity, particularly since we have cautioned the government about the repercussions of implementing these policies.”
Ajaero highlighted that in Nigeria, the removal of subsidies and the increase in prices have rendered essential goods unaffordable, while the government’s social safety nets remain insufficient.
The NLC emphasized that the disparity between IMF recommendations and the actual circumstances in Nigeria underscores a significant flaw in the fund’s economic policy. By distancing itself from the subsidy removal in Nigeria, the IMF reveals a lack of consistency in its guidance, advocating for austerity while avoiding accountability for the ensuing hardships.
NLC contended that this inconsistency diminishes the credibility of the IMF and raises doubts regarding the authenticity of its economic recommendations. It pointed out that the claim of Nigeria having control over its policies contradicts its historical influence, which has frequently led to instability and hardship.
Furthermore, the NLC emphasized the importance of Nigeria and other developing countries reclaiming their economic sovereignty, resisting externally imposed policies that disregard local realities and the needs of the population.
“The IMF’s denial of involvement in Nigeria’s subsidy removal appears disingenuous, considering its history of advocating similar austerity measures. We hope our economic leaders understand that during crises, the IMF and World Bank will distance themselves, leaving the government to shoulder the consequences,” he stated.
He asserted that Nigeria must adopt policies that genuinely address the needs of its citizens by focusing on economic strategies that foster growth, social welfare, and equity, rather than austerity measures that exacerbate economic challenges and social unrest.
“We call on the World Bank and IMF to cease constraining our nation so that we can thrive. They have become a significant obstacle for us, and we may soon be forced to demand their complete withdrawal from Nigeria, as their policies consistently undermine our economy and harm both the people and the nation.”
The NLC has urged the IMF to act decisively and accept accountability, stressing that honesty and transparency are vital to the institution’s professed integrity.
Listen to our podcast, share this story and contact us to share your stories.